Comments on: IO benchmarking for MySQL, part 1 http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/2009/12/io-benchmarking-for-mysql-part-1/ The MySQL Genie -- Nicklas Westerlund Sun, 06 Mar 2011 18:20:06 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Log Buffer #172: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs | The Pythian Blog http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/2009/12/io-benchmarking-for-mysql-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-101 Log Buffer #172: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs | The Pythian Blog Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:56:28 +0000 http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/?p=26#comment-101 [...] mysqlgenie FROM lamp; Nicklas Westerlund published the first part of a series on IO benchmarking for MySQL, showing the results of his tests with [...] [...] mysqlgenie FROM lamp; Nicklas Westerlund published the first part of a series on IO benchmarking for MySQL, showing the results of his tests with [...]

]]> By: IO benchmarking for MySQL, part 1 | Web Developer http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/2009/12/io-benchmarking-for-mysql-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-98 IO benchmarking for MySQL, part 1 | Web Developer Sat, 05 Dec 2009 12:48:49 +0000 http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/?p=26#comment-98 [...] the oltp test, noop had the best results. These results will be published in the next part as well. Read the full article the source. Share Code benchmark, io, mysql Log Buffer #171: a Carnival of the Vanities for [...] [...] the oltp test, noop had the best results. These results will be published in the next part as well. Read the full article the source. Share Code benchmark, io, mysql Log Buffer #171: a Carnival of the Vanities for [...]

]]> By: Peter Zaitsev http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/2009/12/io-benchmarking-for-mysql-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-94 Peter Zaitsev Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:40:12 +0000 http://mysqlgenie.com/wordpress/?p=26#comment-94 Nick, I see you got some nice new hardware to play with :) What RAID controller did you use here ? The Scheduler choice a lot depends on how smart RAID controller really is. Also I'd look for disabled read cache which works best in most cases - You would like to keep the cache used for writes and may be read aheads and Reads are usually waste because OS cache is much larger. Nick,

I see you got some nice new hardware to play with :)
What RAID controller did you use here ? The Scheduler choice a lot depends on how smart RAID controller really is. Also I’d look for disabled read cache which works best in most cases – You would like to keep the cache used for writes and may be read aheads and Reads are usually waste because OS cache is much larger.

]]>